Financial Services firms subject to capital adequacy and solvency requirements are obliged to assess and monitor the level of regulatory capital which must be maintained on a continuing basis. The assessment and monitoring should relate to both the minimum capital requirements (Pillar 1) and the firm’s own assessment of capital required (Pillar 2). All of this should be aligned with business objectives, risk appetite, cost of capital and target return on capital employed.
New legislative requirements (e.g. Capital Requirements Directive and Solvency II) are focusing on the risk sensitivities of how a firm's regulatory capital is determined.
Firms are being encouraged to incorporate a risk management framework to capital allocation. The framework should address all risk types and not just those against which minimum regulatory capital is mandated.
Increased emphasis is being placed on the role of stress and scenario testing, with resulting implications for solvency levels within an organisation.
Allocation of capital has to be aligned with business objectives, risk appetite, cost of capital and target return on capital employed, all of which can be a challenge. We can assist you with turning these challenges into strategic outcomes, through the following:
© 2021 PwC. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the PwC network or one or more of its member firms or both, each of which is a separate legal entity. Please see pwc.com/structure for further details.