Navigating the evolving landscape of international tax transparency

PwC Standard Article Template Hero Image
  • Insight
  • 12 minute read
  • April 02, 2026

Danielle Cunniffe

Partner, PwC Ireland (Republic of)

Lisa Sheehan

Senior Manager, PwC Ireland (Republic of)

Increased international tax transparency brings heightened risks

The digital age has transformed the global economy, making cross-border transactions common and facilitated the rapid expansion of cross‑border information sharing between tax authorities. Exchange of information (EOI) – comprising automatic, spontaneous and on‑request – is a central feature of this global tax transparent environment.

As transparency standards strengthen, taxpayers must recognise information supplied to one tax authority is increasingly likely to be shared widely. For example, in 2024 Irish Revenue automatically exchanged financial account information with 116 jurisdictions. The scope of information shared is continually expanding for example, crypto assets are now included. Furthermore, certain information is becoming public, through public country by country reporting.

This large volume of information can easily be leveraged by tax authorities as they utilise technology, including data analytics and AI tools, by which cross‑border data from multiple sources is ingested and reconciled at scale to flag anomalies, generate risk scores and prompt swift, targeted enquiries or assessments.

Given that most EOI is routine and automatic, this article focuses on EOI on request, which is specifically used when tax authorities have identified an issue which they are investigating and are triangulating information to substantiate it.  

Why EOI on request really matters

EOI on request is a powerful tool at the disposal of tax authorities. It provides for obtaining information, but it also can result in the extension of the statute of limitations for tax audits and reassessments in certain jurisdictions, such as France. In 2024 alone, Revenue dealt with over 2,800 requests. Accordingly, any EOI request should be treated as a red flag, escalated to management and carefully reviewed.

The information sought may already be in the possession of the requested authority. If the domestic authority does not hold it, it may need to obtain it from the taxpayer. In those circumstances, there may be an opportunity for taxpayers to contest the request, or alternatively volunteer additional information to put it in the right context.

Tax authorities can seek EOI on request under various legal frameworks, such as for example the EU Directive 2011/16/EU (DAC) (as amended), Double Taxation Agreements, or the Multilateral Convention of Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters. 

Each legal basis for EOI has a different scope, conditions and procedures, so it is critical to understand the legal basis for the request. Furthermore, there are number of core principles that underpin any EOI on request.

If an EOI request is received, the legal basis should be interrogated and the request measured against the core principles, examples of which are set out below, to determine if resistance or scope limitation is justified. 

1. Reciprocity

Authorities may only request information they could legally obtain domestically. 

2. Confidentiality

Exchanged information must remain confidential and receive equivalent protection to domestic tax data.  

3. Foreseeable relevance

Requests must not be fishing expeditions. In Berlioz Investment Fund SA v Directeur de l’administration des contributions directes, the Court of Justice of the European Union confirmed the requested authority must verify foreseeable relevance before responding.

Additionally, requesting authorities must exhaust domestic information sources unless doing so would be unreasonably burdensome.

OECD countries have committed to sharing information and they undergo peer review, which incentivises them to cooperate efficiently. The Global Forum on Transparency and EOI for tax purposes reported in 2024 that 49% of countries respond to an EOI request within 90 days.  

Given the peer review, tax authorities may be more focused on complying with the EOI request than carefully considering if the information should in fact be shared. Therefore, as a taxpayer it is important that you understand the grounds on which you can refuse to provide information to Revenue, if requested.

Key takeaway

You must ensure any information you give tax authorities is accurate, complete and capable of withstanding scrutiny in multiple jurisdictions.

Given the complexity and potential consequences of cross-border information sharing, taxpayers should take a proactive, strategic approach when preparing their data and when responding to information requests from tax authorities.   

We’re here to help

Our multidisciplinary Tax Risk and Controversy team, comprising ex Revenue officials, ex tax tribunal decision maker and litigation specialists, has extensive expertise in proactive risk management and tax disputes.  

We are ready to guide you through the complexities of EOI, from managing risk upfront, ensuring data in a group is consistent, to responding effectively and strategically to requests. 

Tax risk and controversy

We’re here to help you navigate the challenges.

Contact us

Danielle Cunniffe

Partner, PwC Ireland (Republic of)

Philippa Walsh

Director, PwC Ireland (Republic of)

Lisa Sheehan

Senior Manager, PwC Ireland (Republic of)

Tel: +353 87 359 0702

Follow PwC Ireland